
By Edwin Simonds, Founder of Offload
· 7 min read
Quick answer
To identify a client's core beliefs, start with the automatic thoughts they already record. Look for themes that repeat across thought records, and notice which thoughts carry the most emotion. Then use the downward arrow: ask what the thought means about them, and keep asking until you reach a basic statement such as "I'm worthless." Treat that statement as a hypothesis to test together.
Core beliefs are fundamental, rigid and generalized beliefs that a person holds about themselves, other people, the world or the future. Wenzel uses this definition, drawing on Judith Beck and Keith Dobson. Examples include "I'm worthless," "I'm incompetent" and "I'm trapped."
Core beliefs usually form from messages a person receives over time, often in childhood. Wenzel notes they can also form or change in adulthood after very stressful events. A person tends to treat the belief as a fact rather than an idea, which is part of what makes it hard to examine.
Padesky describes schemas as core beliefs that cognitive therapists think play a central role in maintaining long-term problems. The two terms are often used together. In Wenzel's account, core beliefs are the content of a schema.
Core beliefs sit underneath automatic thoughts and make certain thoughts more likely in certain situations. Between the two sit intermediate beliefs: the rules, attitudes and assumptions a person lives by, often worded as "if, then" statements.
Wenzel gives an example. A student with the core belief "I'm a failure" might live by the rule "If I get anything less than all As, then I'm a failure." A low grade then triggers the automatic thought "I'm never going to get into medical school." A different student with the core belief "I'm unlovable" might react to the same grade with "Why should anyone care about me?"
Wenzel also describes how core beliefs bias attention and memory. A person notices and remembers information that fits the belief and overlooks information that does not. This keeps the belief in place, even when contrary evidence is available.
Most cognitive therapists work on core beliefs later in treatment, after the client has practiced with automatic thoughts. Wenzel gives two reasons. Some clients first need practice spotting the thoughts linked to their moods. Others find naming a core belief too painful early on, and working with situational thoughts first lets them get comfortable examining their own thinking.
There are exceptions. Some clients arrive able to name the belief they want to work on in the first session.
James and Barton advise care at this level. Core beliefs shape a client's self-concept and view of the world, and they note that lasting change is hard to achieve. Wenzel adds that sustained attention to core beliefs can raise distress, and clients may feel worse between sessions. Check that the client has coping skills in place before you start, and plan for that possibility together.
Identify core beliefs collaboratively, starting from material the client has already produced.
Wenzel describes the downward arrow as perhaps the best-known strategy for this. In one of her case examples, a client who feared blushing in social situations started from the thought "Others are going to see that I am red" and arrived at "I am weak" and "I am less than a man."
Some therapists also use self-report questionnaires, which can cover a wide range of beliefs in a short time. Wenzel cautions that clients may not yet be aware of their beliefs and that a questionnaire may miss an individual's belief. So treat questionnaire results as hypotheses too.
Common negative core beliefs about the self cluster around a few themes: being unlovable, inadequate, helpless or worthless. Wenzel describes three main themes: lovability ("I am undesirable"), adequacy ("I am incompetent") and helplessness ("I am trapped").
Research on measuring core beliefs points in a similar direction. In developing the Negative Core Beliefs Inventory, Osmo and colleagues found that beliefs about the self and beliefs about others fell on separate dimensions. They found preliminary evidence that beliefs about the self split further into helplessness and inferiority, helplessness and vulnerability, unlovability, and worthlessness. Scores were linked with reports of negative childhood experiences, attachment styles, anxiety and depression.
Core beliefs can also be about other people or the world. In one of Wenzel's examples, a man who returned from combat held the belief "The world is cruel." These categories are a guide for listening, not a checklist. Use the client's own wording.
Core beliefs change gradually, by lowering how strongly the client holds the old belief and building a new, more balanced one. Wenzel notes they are almost never changed after a single session. Padesky describes several clinical methods for weakening an old schema and building a new one.
Most therapists combine several of these methods, chosen to fit the client's formulation.
The research on core belief work as a separate step is limited. Wenzel notes that CBT as a whole has been tested in many trials, but that the research has little to say about whether core belief work improves outcomes beyond earlier work on automatic thoughts and behavior.
Schema therapy, which targets similar deep beliefs, has a small evidence base on this question. A systematic review by Taylor and colleagues included 12 studies, and required each one to measure schema change. Schema change and symptom change were both found in 11 of the 12. The authors concluded that schema therapy showed initial significant results for personality disorders, but that formal mediation studies were lacking and rigorous evidence for other disorders was sparse.
In practice, this means core belief work rests mainly on clinical theory and experience. Keep track of how strongly the client holds the old and new beliefs over time, so you can see whether the work is helping.
Much of the groundwork for core belief work can happen between sessions, so session time can go on the harder conversations.
Treat what the client brings back as a starting point for discussion, not a finished formulation. If you need a refresher on the layer above core beliefs, see our guides to automatic thoughts and thought records.
You can assign these tools to a client in Offload in one click and review their responses before the next session. Start your 30-day trial.
The downward arrow is a questioning technique for finding the belief underneath an automatic thought. You ask what the thought would mean if it were true, and what that says about the client, then repeat the question with each answer. You stop when you reach a basic statement about the self, others or the world that has no further meaning underneath it.
A core belief is an absolute statement, such as "I'm a failure." An intermediate belief is a rule, attitude or assumption that grows from it, often worded as an "if, then" statement, such as "If I get anything less than all As, then I'm a failure." Intermediate beliefs sit between core beliefs and automatic thoughts.
There is no set time. Core beliefs are often held for many years, and Wenzel notes they are almost never changed after a single session. Change tends to happen gradually, as the client collects evidence for a new belief over weeks and rates how strongly they hold the old and new beliefs.
Yes, a client can have more than one. In one of Wenzel's case examples, the downward arrow led a client to two related beliefs: "I am weak" and "I am less than a man." Beliefs can also be about the self, other people or the world at the same time.