
By Edwin Simonds, Founder of Offload
· 5 min read
Quick answer
To build an exposure hierarchy, agree on the fear the client wants to work on, list the situations they avoid, and rate how hard each one would be. Order the list from easiest to hardest and pick a manageable first step. Before each practice, note what the client expects to happen. Afterward, compare it with what actually happened, then plan the next step together.
An exposure hierarchy is a list of feared situations, ordered from least to most difficult, that a client works through during exposure therapy. It is also called a fear hierarchy or an exposure ladder. The list turns a broad fear, such as "I can't handle social situations," into specific actions the client can plan and practice one at a time.
Exposure means repeatedly approaching what a person fears instead of avoiding it. Craske and colleagues describe it as a mainstay of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety, delivered in different forms: graduated or intense, brief or prolonged, and imaginal, interoceptive or in real life. The hierarchy is the planning tool for the graduated form.
Exposure-based CBT has good research support for anxiety and related disorders, although not every client benefits.
Build the hierarchy together in session, starting from the client's own avoidance rather than a standard list.
The items should be concrete actions the client could do this week, with details that make each one easier or harder. Vague items such as "be more social" are hard to practice and hard to review.
For a client who fears speaking up at work, a hierarchy might look like this:
You can change the difficulty of an item by changing its details: how long it lasts, who is present, where it happens, and whether the client brings anything they rely on for comfort. Those details are also useful later, when you vary practice on purpose.
No, a strict easiest-to-hardest order is not required, though starting low remains common. Traditional exposure moves from one item to the next and repeats each item until anxiety falls. Craske and colleagues describe an alternative, variable exposure, where items are taken in random order. They note that it usually still begins with the least anxiety-provoking item, to avoid the client refusing treatment.
The research behind this is early. In an experiment with 50 undergraduates with high contamination fears, a gradual, constant approach and a random, variable approach both reduced subjective fear, with no significant difference between them. The authors concluded that the traditional method is sufficient but not necessary. They also noted that their behavioral and physiological findings were limited, and that the sample was not a clinical group.
A related finding matters for pacing. Craske and colleagues report that how much fear drops by the end of an exposure does not predict fear at follow-up. So you do not have to wait for anxiety to fall before moving on. The focus is what the client learned: did the feared outcome happen?
Safety behaviors are actions a person takes to prevent, escape or reduce a feared outcome or the distress around it. Blakey and Abramowitz define them this way and note that research consistently links them to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders.
Craske and colleagues list the presence of another person, therapists, cell phones, and food or drink among the common safety signals and behaviors for clients with anxiety.
Traditionally, safety behaviors are removed during exposure. Blakey and Abramowitz point out that the evidence on their effects during exposure is limited and mixed. Craske and colleagues prefer removing them straight away if the client is willing, and suggest phasing them out gradually only to reduce dropout. In practice, list the client's safety behaviors alongside each hierarchy item, and agree in advance which ones they will drop.
Most exposure practice happens between sessions, so it helps when the client has a clear plan and a simple way to record each attempt.
Treat the anxiety ratings as information for planning, not a pass or fail score. The more useful question is what the client expected and what actually happened. If clients struggle to complete practice, our guide to therapy homework engagement covers common barriers, and decatastrophizing can help you explore the feared outcome before an exposure.
You can assign all three tools to a client in Offload in one click and review each attempt before the next session. Start your 30-day trial.
There is no difference: they are two names for the same thing. Both describe a list of feared situations ordered from easiest to hardest. You may also see the term fear hierarchy.
There is no fixed number of steps. Include enough that the gap between neighboring items feels manageable for the client, and add a step in between when a jump feels too big. Offload's Build an Exposure Ladder tool uses five steps, from easiest to hardest.
No, not necessarily. Craske and colleagues report that how much fear drops by the end of an exposure does not predict fear at follow-up. They suggest focusing on whether the client's feared outcome happened and what they learned, rather than waiting for anxiety to fall.
Exposure and response prevention (ERP) is a form of exposure used in CBT for obsessive compulsive disorder. NICE recommends CBT including ERP for adults with OCD. For adults with obsessive thoughts but no overt compulsions, NICE describes it as exposure to the obsessive thoughts plus response prevention of mental rituals and neutralizing strategies.